全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Digitalisation of SPLUMA to Enhance Smart Township Policies at Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality: Literature Paper

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1115069, PP. 1-16

Subject Areas: Technology And Innovation, Rural Planning

Keywords: Digitalisation, SPLUMA, Smart Township Policies, Local Economic Development, Institutional Capacity, Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Globally, digital planning platforms enable municipalities to identify economic opportunities and optimize infrastructure investment in Africa. Digital spatial planning has similar potential, particularly in addressing historical spatial inequalities and informal settlement challenges. For example, in South Africa, the digitalisation of SPLUMA enables municipalities to efficiently process land-use applications, plan township upgrades, and integrate economic nodes into development frameworks, thereby creating opportunities for small businesses and local communities and streamlining land-use approvals, creating a more business-friendly environment. This paper examines how digital tools can bridge the gap between policy intent and practical outcomes, using Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality (EMLM) as a case study. Key constraints include misalignment between political priorities and administrative capacity, fragmented planning and poor interdepartmental coordination, and limited institutional learning alongside weak community engagement. The findings of this study reveal that the implementation of smart township policies and the digitalisation of SPLUMA in EMLM is constrained by interconnected institutional factors. Firstly, there is a misalignment between political priorities and administrative capacity, which hampers translating policy intent into actionable programmes. Secondly, planning and coordination across municipal departments and spheres of government remain fragmented, resulting in duplication of efforts and inefficiencies. Thirdly, limited institutional learning and weak community engagement reduce the effectiveness of participatory processes, leaving local stakeholders underrepresented in decisionmaking. As a result, policies are often well-articulated in planning documents but remain weakly operationalised on the ground. Despite these challenges, the paper highlights opportunities to enhance LED through digital tools that can streamline planning, improve interdepartmental coordination, and foster meaningful community participation. Overall, the results demonstrate that institutional realignment, capacity-building, and participatory approaches are essential to ensure that SPLUMA digitalisation contributes effectively to inclusive and sustainable township development.

Cite this paper

Nwabisa, D. and Zukiswa, R. (2026). Digitalisation of SPLUMA to Enhance Smart Township Policies at Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality: Literature Paper. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e15069. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1115069.

References

[1]  Nyamwanza, S., Chakwizira, J., Beattie, M. and Ingwani, E. (2025) Spatial Plan-ning Constraints in Marginalised Areas. Town and Regional Planning, 86, 62-76. https://doi.org/10.38140/trp.v86i.8765
[2]  Turok, I., Visagie, J. and Scheba, A. (2021) Social Inequality and Spatial Segregation in Cape Town. In: van Ham, M., Tammaru, T., Ubarevičienė, R. and Janssen, H., Eds., Urban So-cio-Economic Segregation and Income Inequality, Springer, 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64569-4_4
[3]  Department of Coopera-tive Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) (2016) Integrated Urban De-velopment Framework: A New Deal for South African Cities and Towns.
[4]  National Planning Commission (NPC) (2025) Service Delivery Research Report. NPC.
[5]  Heukelman, A. and Cilliers, E.J. (2025) SPLUMA: The Transformation of Land Use Planning Administration and Governance in South Africa. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 28, 1-36. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2025/v28i0a17997
[6]  Stam, E. and van de Ven, A. (2021) Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Elements. Small Business Economics, 56, 809-832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00270-6
[7]  Manda, M.I. (2022) Power, Politics, and the Institutionalisation of Information Systems for Promot-ing Digital Transformation in the Public Sector: A Case of the South African’s Government Digital Transformation Journey. Information Polity, 27, 311-329. https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-200233
[8]  Mashau, N.L. and Kroeze, J.H. (2023) Challenges That Affect Smart City Implementation in Small and Rural Municipalities. SA Journal of Information Management, 25, a1703. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v25i1.1703
[9]  South African Local Govern-ment Association (SALGA) (2022) State of Local Government Report. SAL-GA.
[10]  Marawu, N.M., Utete, R. and Zhou, S. (2023) Good Governance as an Economic Driver for Service Delivery: Lessons for South African Government. International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities, 6, 71-93. https://doi.org/10.31098/ijmesh.v6i2.1219
[11]  Ahmed, S. and Gillwald, A. (2020) Smart Townships Will Build Smarter Cities. Policy Brief No. 3, Research ICT Africa.
[12]  Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) (2023) District Development Model Booklet. COGTA.
[13]  Teti, M., Nzewi, O.I. and Lungisa, S. (2024) The District Development Model as a Catalyst for Improved Integrated Development Planning. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 5, a153. https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v5i0.153
[14]  Republic of South Africa (1996) Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Government Printer.
[15]  Republic of South Africa (2000) Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000. Government Printer.
[16]  Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) (2020) Assessment of the Performance of Municipalities against the Back-to-Basics Programme.
[17]  Auditor-General of South Africa (AGSA) (2022) Consolidated General Report on National and Provincial Audit Out-comes. AGSA.
[18]  Enoch Mgijima Local Municipality (EMLM) (2024) Final In-tegrated Development Plan (2023/24 Review). EMLM.
[19]  Van Rooyen, E.J., Nel, J.E. and Akbar, K. (2025) Social Value of Integrated Development Planning. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 14, 846-856.
[20]  Mpolweni, N., Kabange, M. and Fagbadebo, O.M. (2024) Inte-grated Development Plan Strategies for Service Delivery in Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Municipality. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Re-view, 12, a835. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v12i1.835
[21]  Hill, M. and Hupe, P. (2021) Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance. 4th Edition, Sage.
[22]  Fourie, D.J. and der Waldt, G.V. (2021) Participative Integrated Development Planning Praxis in Local Gov-ernment: The Case of Selected South African Municipalities. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 2, a43. https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v2i0.43
[23]  Nzewi, O.I. (2025) Adaptive Gov-ernance for Resilient Local Service Delivery. Journal of Local Government Re-search and Innovation, 6, a322. https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v6i0.322
[24]  Matlala, L.S. (2025) A Review of South Africa’s Outcome-Based Approach. Administratio Publica, 33, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.61967/adminpub.2025.33.2.3
[25]  Malan, C., Fourie, D. and van der Waldt, G. (2025) Gauging the Institutional Readiness and Resili-ence of Local Government. Administratio Publica, 33, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.61967/adminpub.2025.33.3.1
[26]  Ceesay, A. and As-morowati, S. (2025) Beyond the Peace Agreement: Institutional Weakness and Governance Challenges in Post-Conflict South Sudan. Journal of Asian and Afri-can Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00219096251376658
[27]  Muringa, T. and Shava, E. (2025) ‘It’s All Talk but No Action’—Navigating Political and Ad-ministrative Will in Transforming Local Government. Cogent Social Sciences, 11, Article: 2516078. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2516078
[28]  Domorenok, E., Gra-ziano, P. and Polverari, L. (2021) Introduction: Policy Integration and Institu-tional Capacity: Theoretical, Conceptual and Empirical Challenges. Policy and Society, 40, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1902058
[29]  Rulashe, T. and Ijeoma, E.O.C. (2022) An Exploration of Public Accountability and Service De-livery at the Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality in the Eastern Cape Prov-ince, South Africa. Africa’s Public Service Delivery & Performance Review, 10, a535. https://doi.org/10.4102/apsdpr.v10i1.535
[30]  Shava, E. and Muringa, T.P. (2024) Curbing Bureaucratic Limitations through Continuous Learning in Local Government in South Africa. Frontiers in Political Science, 6, Article 1435414. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2024.1435414
[31]  Adom, R.K. and Simatele, M.D. (2024) Overcoming Systemic and Institutional Challenges in Pol-icy Implementation in South Africa’s Water Sector. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 10, Article No. 69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-024-01040-3
[32]  South African Local Gov-ernment Association (SALGA) (2022) In.Know.Vation 8th Edition: Municipal Innovation and Technology Edition. https://www.salga.org.za/Documents/Knowledge-products-<br />per-theme/Municipal%20Innovation%20n%20Technology/in.Know.vation%208th%20Edition.pdf
[33]  Matshika, L.P. and Gumbo, T. (2023) A Framework for Spatial and So-cio-Economic Sustainability of Cities in the Global South: Learning from City of Ekurhuleni. Journal of Inclusive Cities and Built Environment, 3, 85-97.
[34]  Buthelezi, N.B.C., Onatu, G.O. and Aigbavboa, C.O. (2025) Plan-ning Approval of Housing Developments: Case Study of the City of Johannes-burg and Tshwane Metropolitan Municipalities of South Africa. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, Article 1468965. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsc.2025.1468965
[35]  Levi-Faur, D., Ka-riv-Teitelbaum, Y. and Medzini, R. (2021) Regulatory Governance: History, Theories, Strategies and Challenges. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Poli-tics.
[36]  Republic of South Africa (2013) Spatial Planning and Land Use Man-agement Act (SPLUMA) 16 of 2013. Government Printer.
[37]  Hoefer, R. (2022) Institutionalism as a Theory for Understanding Policy Creation: An Un-derused Resource. Journal of Policy Practice and Research, 3, 71-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42972-022-00059-0
[38]  UN-Habitat (2022) World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. UN-Habitat.
[39]  Chesa, E., Shopola, A. and Juta, L. (2025) The Effectiveness of Service Provision in the South African Local Municipalities. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), 14, 192-198. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v14i1.3633
[40]  Cloete, H.C.A. (2023) Con-textualising the Factors Influencing Human Resource Development in Munici-palities. Journal of Local Government Research and Innovation, 4, a119. https://doi.org/10.4102/jolgri.v4i0.119
[41]  Prakash, D. (2025) Why Do Smart City Projects Fail to Create Impact? Understanding Decision-Making in Smart City Policy Implementation. Urban Governance, 5, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.02.004
[42]  Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) (2021) Gov-ernment at a Glance 2021. OECD Publishing.
[43]  Human Sciences Research Council (HSRC) (2025) Em-bedding Digital Participation in Municipality Planning and Policymaking. HSRC.
[44]  World Bank (2023) World Development Report 2023: Migrants, Refugees and Societies. World Bank.
[45]  Ansell, C. and Torfing, J. (2021) Pub-lic Governance as Co-creation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108765381
[46]  Matlala, L.S. (2025) Why Oversight Recommendations Fail. Cogent Social Sciences.
[47]  Mamokhere, J. and Meyer, D.F. (2022) A Review of Mechanisms Used to Improve Community Participation in the Integrated Development Planning Process in South Africa: An Empirical Review. Social Sciences, 11, Article 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100448
[48]  Sager, F. and Gofen, A. (2022) The Polity of Implementation: Organizational and Institutional Arrangements in Policy Implementation. Governance, 35, 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12677
[49]  Ngcaweni, B. (2025) Digital Gov-ernment Can Benefit Citizens. Wits University News.
[50]  Almulhim, A.I. and Yigitcanlar, T. (2025) Smart Governance of Sustainable Cities: A Review and Multidimensional Framework. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.0394.v1
[51]  Department of Land Reform and Rural Development (2025) Strategic Plan 2025-2029.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133