Constitutional Review in the Face of Defective Notifications: Reasonableness and Limits of Amparo and Habeas Corpus Proceedings

This article examines the constitutional control of defective notifications and their impact on the limits of amparo and habeas corpus in Peru. It analyzes how procedural defects may violate the right to due process when they cause real and tangible harm, as well as the criteria established by the Constitutional Court to assess their constitutional significance. It argues that judicial intervention in these constitutional remedies must remain within reasonable limits, establishing clear restrictions for their filing to avoid overloading the Constitutional Court while ensuring effective procedural communication without compromising the efficiency of the judicial system.