全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Diagnostic Correlation of Antinuclear Antibodies Detected by ELISA and Indirect Immunofluorescence in Patients Attending a Private Laboratory in Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1114221, PP. 1-11

Subject Areas: Immunology, Infectious Diseases

Keywords: Antinuclear Antibodies, Indirect Immunofluorescence (IFA), ELISA, Rheumatology, LES

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are immunoglobulins directed against nuclear and cytoplasmic components of autologous cells, reflecting the loss of immunological tolerance and having a multifactorial origin. This study relates antinuclear antibodies by ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) in patients attended at Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela 2022. Patients and Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted to relate antinuclear antibodies by ELISA and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) in patients attended at Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela 2022. The population consisted of 70 patients of both genders. Results: Of the population studied, 29 patients tested positive by indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) (41.43%) and 7 patients by the ELISA method (10.00%). Regarding gender, it was observed that the total population that tested positive was female (IFA: 41.43%. ELISA: 10%). According to Fisher’s test (equal to 0.04), this result was significant (p < 0.05). Of the 29 patients who tested positive by (IFA), 13 patients (18.58%) were in the age range of 25 - 45 years. Similarly, through the ELISA method, of the 7 patients (10.00%) who tested positive, 4 (5.71%) were in the age range of 25 - 45 years, these results according to Fisher’s exact test were not significant. Conclusions: After describing the positive and negative results by (IFA) and ELISA methods, it is observed that 58.57% of the patients had negative results in both methods. 31.43% had a positive result by the IFA method and negative by ELISA, and 10.00% were positive by both (IFA) and ELISA. It is noteworthy that patients positive by ELISA had an antibody titer greater than 1:160 in the IFA test.

Cite this paper

Gómez-Sifontes, A. E. , Terrizzi, J. E. T. G. , Cremona-Dávila, A. R. , Rodríguez, C. , Partidas-Uribe, G. E. , Cuba-Garrido, C. G. and Saavedra-Duque, A. R. (2025). Diagnostic Correlation of Antinuclear Antibodies Detected by ELISA and Indirect Immunofluorescence in Patients Attending a Private Laboratory in Ciudad Bolívar, Venezuela. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e14221. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1114221.

References

[1]  Cabiedes, J. and Núnez-álvarez, C.A. (2010) Anticuerpos antinucleares. Reumatología Clínica, 6, 224-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reuma.2009.10.004
[2]  Chan, E.K.L., Damoiseaux, J., Carballo, O.G., Conrad, K., de Melo Cruvinel, W., Francescantonio, P.L.C., et al. (2015) Report of the First International Consensus on Standardized Nomenclature of Antinuclear Anti-body HEp-2 Cell Patterns 2014-2015. Frontiers in Immunology, 6, Article 412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00412
[3]  Oliva-Menacho, J.E., Arroyo-Acevedo, J.L., Oliva-Candela, J.A. and García-Hjarles, M.A. (2019) Patrones de tinción de anticuerpos antinucleares identificados por Inmunofluorescencia indirecta en pacientes con enfer-medad del tejido conectivo. Revista Médica Herediana, 30, 33-39. https://doi.org/10.20453/rmh.v30i1.3470
[4]  Herold, M., Klotz, W., Andrade, L.E.C., Conrad, K., de Melo Cruvinel, W., Damoiseaux, J., et al. (2018) International Consensus on Antinuclear Anti-body Patterns: Defining Negative Results and Reporting Unidentified Patterns. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 56, 1799-1802. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-0052
[5]  Tebo, A.E. (2017) Recent Approaches to Optimize Laboratory Assess-ment of Antinuclear Antibodies. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, 24, e00270-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/cvi.00270-17
[6]  von Mühlen, C.A., Garcia-De La Torre, I., Infantino, M., Damoiseaux, J., Andrade, L.E.C., Carballo, O.G., et al. (2021) How to Report the Antinuclear Antibodies (Anti-Cell Antibodies) Test on HEp-2 Cells: Guidelines from the ICAP Initiative. Immunologic Research, 69, 594-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-021-09233-0
[7]  Tozzoli, R., Antico, A., Porcelli, B. and Bassetti, D. (2012) Automation in Indirect Immunofluorescence Testing: A New Step in the Evolution of the Autoimmunology Laboratory. Autoimmunity Highlights, 3, 59-65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-012-0035-2
[8]  Loock, C.D., Egerer, K., Feist, E. and Burmester, G. (2017) Automated Eval-uation of ANA under Real-Life Conditions. RMD Open, 3, e000409. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2016-000409
[9]  Khalifah, M.J., Almansouri, O., Mowallad, A., Aga, S., Aljefri, A.A., Almalki, A., et al. (2022) Comparison of Indirect Immunofluorescence and Enzyme Immunoassay for the Detection of Antinuclear Antibodies. Cureus, 14, e31049. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31049
[10]  Irure-Ventura, J. and López-Hoyos, M. (2022) The Past, Present, and Future in Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA). Diagnostics, 12, Article 647. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12030647
[11]  Mundial, A.M. (2013) Declara-ción de Helsinki de la AMM—Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos (64a Asamblea General, Fortaleza, Brasil, 2013). https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/
[12]  Shovman, O., Gilburd, B., Barzilai, O., Shinar, E., Larida, B., Zandman‐GODDARD, G., et al. (2005) Evaluation of the BioPlexTM 2200 ANA Screen: Analysis of 510 Healthy Subjects: Incidence of Natural/Predictive Autoantibodies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1050, 380-388. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1313.120
[13]  Berkem, R., et al. (2003) Antinükleer an-tikorlarin saptanmasinda kullanilan yontem-lerin karsilastirilmasi [Comparison of the Methods Used for the Detection of Anti-Nuclear Antibodies]. Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni, 37, 171-178. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14593900/
[14]  Rodsaward, P., Chottawornsak, N., Suwanchote, S., Rachayon, M., Deekajorndech, T., Wright, H.L., et al. (2021) The Clinical Significance of Antinuclear Antibodies and Specific Autoantibodies in Juvenile and Adult Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients. Asian Pacific Journal of Allergy and Immunol-ogy, 39, 279-286. https://doi.org/10.12932/AP-211218-0465
[15]  Grygiel-Górniak, B., Rogacka, N. and Puszczewicz, M. (2018) Antinuclear Antibodies in Healthy People and Non-Rheumatic Diseases—Diagnostic and Clinical Implications. Rheumatology, 56, 243-248. https://doi.org/10.5114/reum.2018.77976
[16]  Wiik, A.S. and Bizzaro, N. (2012) Missing Links in High Quality Diagnostics of Inflammatory Systemic Rheumatic Diseases. Autoimmunity Highlights, 3, 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13317-012-0029-0
[17]  Gómez-Sifontes, A.E., Diaz-Tablero, J.A. and Rodriguez, Y.J.G.G. (2025) Anti-C1q Antibodies as Markers of Renal Involvement in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Bolivar City, Venezuela. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e12987. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112987
[18]  Williams, E.L. and Edwards, C.J. (2006) Patient Preferences in Choosing Anti-TNF Therapies-R1. Rheumatology, 45, 1575-1576. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel369
[19]  Kavanaugh, A., Tomar, R., Reveille, J., Solomon, D.H. and Homburger, H.A. (2000) Guidelines for Clinical Use of the Antinuclear Antibody Test and Tests for Specific Autoantibodies to Nuclear Antigens. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 124, 71-81. https://doi.org/10.5858/2000-124-0071-gfcuot
[20]  Vasdev, V., Patnaik, S.K., Bhakuni, D.S., Shanmuganandan, K., Bhayana, A., Mullick, G., et al. (2022) Assessment of Ideal Serum Dilution for Screening of Antinuclear Antibodies by an Indirect Immunofluores-cence Method in Diagnosis of Autoimmune Disorders. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 78, 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.03.008
[21]  Menor Almagro, R., Rodríguez Gutiérrez, J.F., Martín-Martínez, M.A., Rodríguez Valls, M.J., Aranda Valera, C. and de la Iglesia Salgado, J.L. (2017) Asociación entre títulos de anticuerpos antinucleares y conec-tivopatías sistémicas en una Unidad de Reumatología. Reumatología Clínica, 13, 150-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reuma.2016.03.019
[22]  Alsaed, O.S., Alamlih, L.I., Al-Radideh, O., Chandra, P., Alemadi, S. and Al-Allaf, A. (2021) Clinical Utility of ANA-ELISA vs Ana-Immunofluorescence in Connective Tissue Diseases. Scientific Reports, 11, Article No. 8229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87366-w
[23]  Choi, M.Y., Clarke, A.E., Urowitz, M., Hanly, J., St-Pierre, Y., Gordon, C., et al. (2022) Longitudinal Analysis of ANA in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) Inception Cohort. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 81, 1143-1150. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-222168
[24]  Pedano, V., Pascual, C., Silvera, é. and Vaca, A. (2019) Concordancia y exactitud diagnóstica entre inmunofluorescencia indirecta y enzimoinmunoensayo para el cribado de anticuerpos anti-nucleares. https://cobico.com.ar/wp-content/archivos/2019/05/Trabajo-Bioq.-Clarisa-Pascual-para-publicar.pdf
[25]  Boglione, L., Ferrero, P., Mussano, E., Onetti, L. and Acosta, C. (2025) Comparación entre en-zimoinmunoensayo e inmunofluorescencia indirecta para detección de anticuerpos anti-centromero. Laboratorio de Inmunología y Virología, Hospital Nacional de Clínicas, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. Santa Rosa 1564, Córdoba, Argentina. https://www.cobico.com.ar/wp-content/archivos/2013/06/Trabajo-de-Investigacion-Dra.-Boglione.doc

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133