Methylmercury (MeHg) is an extremely dangerous and toxic organometallic compound that has been found to be persistent and recurrent in various compositions of the environment and is highly suspected to cause dangerous problems in ecosystems and public health owing to the accumulative and magnifying effects that it may cause in the food chain. Soil, one of the essential components for both the storage and partial release of MeHg, is a critical medium through which this compound moves within the environment and has impacts felt in the respective areas. Even though the level of MeHg may be very low in soil, the main challenges in measuring the compound include the minute concentration levels, the molecular adhesion to organic matter as well as its change into other forms of mercury. Therefore, this study looks at the different methodologies that enhance the separation and detection of methyl mercury in soil followed by its determination at lower levels of practice and higher precision for better analysis. The study focuses on advanced methods such as distillation, purge-and-trap gas chromatography, and cold atomic fluorescence spectrometry (CAFS) which have been proven to be useful in the determination of trace amounts of MeHg in soil samples at ultra-low levels of detection considering the existing complexities in the process. The study further discusses the advantages of employing automated devices, such as the HXAM-51(II) alkylmercury analyzer, in order to limit the chances of contamination during sampling, increase the levels of precision within this critical area of research, and also minimize the risks that laboratory operators are exposed to due to the presence of toxic mercury vapors. The application of the results obtained from this study would deeply assist in the enhancement of the measurement techniques, risk evaluation, and management methods intended to alleviate the negative consequences that mercury pollution has in the delicate ecosystems that exist on land.
Cite this paper
Blamah, S. and Xu, S. (2026). Pre-Concentration and Detection of Methylmercury in Soil. Open Access Library Journal, 13, e14188. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1114188.
Clarkson, T.W. and Magos, L. (2006) The Toxicology of Mercury and Its Chemi-cal Compounds. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36, 609-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408440600845619
Wu, Q., Hu, H., Meng, B., Wang, B., Poulain, A.J., Zhang, H., et al. (2020) Methanogenesis Is an Important Process in Controlling MeHg Concentration in Rice Paddy Soils Affected by Min-ing Activities. Environmental Science & Technology, 54, 13517-13526. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c00268
Teng, D., Mao, K., Ali, W., Xu, G., Huang, G., Niazi, N.K., et al. (2020) Describing the Toxicity and Sources and the Remediation Technologies for Mercury-Contaminated Soil. RSC Advances, 10, 23221-23232. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ra01507e
O’Connor, D., Hou, D., Ok, Y.S., Mulder, J., Duan, L., Wu, Q., et al. (2019) Mercury Speciation, Transformation, and Transportation in Soils, Atmospheric Flux, and Implica-tions for Risk Management: A Critical Review. Environment International, 126, 747-761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.019
Krata, A.A. (2022) Assignation of Inorganic Mercury and Methylmercury Mass Fractions in a Soil Matrix Certified Reference Material by Two Analytical Methodologies Based on Species-Specific Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry and Chromato-graphic Separation. Journal of Separation Science, 45, 3624-3634. https://doi.org/10.1002/jssc.202200347
Lei, P., Zhang, J., Kong, Y., He, H. and Zhong, H. (2025) Optimization of the Determination of Methylmercury in Solid Matrix Samples. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicol-ogy, 114, Article No. 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-024-03993-9
Qin, P., Cai, Z., Wei, C., Guan, Y., Li, B., Huang, J., et al. (2025) Comparative Study of Two Common Methods for the Determination of Total Mercury in Soil. Royal Society Open Sci-ence, 12, Article ID: 240757. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240757
Charkiewicz, A.E., Omeljaniuk, W.J., Garley, M. and Nikliński, J. (2025) Mercury Exposure and Health Effects: What Do We Really Know? International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26, Ar-ticle No. 2326. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26052326
Tang, W., Chu, J. and Zhong, H. (2023) Alkaline Extraction: An Optimal Approach for Extracting Methylmercury from Paddy Soils. Science of the Total Environment, 885, Article ID: 163776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163776
Steen, A.D., Kusch, S., Abdulla, H.A., Cakić, N., Coffinet, S., Dittmar, T., et al. (2020) Analytical and Computational Advances, Opportunities, and Challenges in Marine Organic Bi-ogeochemistry in an Era of “Omics”. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, Article No. 718. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00718
Gorecki, J., Díez, S., Macherzynski, M., Kalisinska, E. and Golas, J. (2013) Improvements and Appli-cation of a Modified Gas Chromatography Atomic Fluorescence Spectroscopy Method for Routine Determination of Methylmercury in Biota Samples. Talanta, 115, 675-680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2013.06.037
Iwai-Shimada, M., Koba-yashi, Y., Isobe, T., Nakayama, S.F., Sekiyama, M., Taniguchi, Y., et al. (2021) Comparison of Simultaneous Quantitative Analysis of Methylmercury and Inor-ganic Mercury in Cord Blood Using LC-ICP-MS and LC-CVAFS: The Pilot Study of the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Toxics, 9, Article No. 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics9040082
Atasoy, M. (2024) Development of a New Technique for Determination of Mercury in Tap Water and Fish Mus-cle Tissue Samples Using Mo-Coated Tungsten-Coil Atom Trap Cold Vapor Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Mugla Journal of Science and Technology, 10, 152-158. https://doi.org/10.22531/muglajsci.1473671
Yang, Q., Wang, Y. and Zhong, H. (2021) Remediation of Mercury-Contaminated Soils and Sed-iments Using Biochar: A Critical Review. Biochar, 3, 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-021-00087-1
Qin, A., Ran, S., He, T., Yin, D. and Xu, Y. (2023) The Effects of Different Soil Component Couplings on the Methylation and Bioavailability of Mercury in Soil. Toxics, 11, Article No. 942. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11110942
Perez, P.A., Hintelman, H., Quiroz, W. and Bravo, M.A. (2017) Critical Evaluation of Distillation Procedure for the Determination of Methylmercury in Soil Samples. Chemosphere, 186, 570-575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.08.034
Pietilä, H., Perämäki, P., Piispanen, J., Starr, M., Nieminen, T., Kantola, M., et al. (2015) Determination of Low Methylmercury Concentrations in Peat Soil Samples by Isotope Dilution GC-ICP-MS Using Distillation and Solvent Extraction Methods. Chemosphere, 124, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.11.001
Gałuszka, A., Migaszewski, Z.M. and Namieśnik, J. (2015) Moving Your Laboratories to the Field—Advantages and Limitations of the Use of Field Portable Instruments in Environmental Sample Analysis. Environmental Research, 140, 593-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2015.05.017
Thomas, D., Schütze, B., Heinze, W.M. and Steinmetz, Z. (2020) Sample Preparation Techniques for the Analysis of Microplastics in Soil—A Review. Sustainability, 12, Article No. 9074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219074
Takemura, K., Iwasaki, W., Morita, N., Ohmagari, S., Takaki, Y., Fukaura, H., et al. (2024) Determination of Low Concentrations of Mercury Based on the Electrodeposition Time. Nanomaterials, 14, Article No. 981. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano14110981
Rodríguez-Maese, R., Rodríguez-Saldaña, V., Ferrer, L. and Leal, L.O. (2024) The Role of Automation in the Analysis of Manganese in Environmental Water Samples. Water, 16, Ar-ticle No. 1659. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16121659
Fernández-Martínez, R. and Rucandio, I. (2013) A Simplified Method for Determination of Organic Mercury in Soils. Analytical Methods, 5, 4131-4137. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ay40566d
Le, M.T.H., Nguyen, H.C., Huynh, T.Q. and Nguyen, D.V. (2019) A Home—Made Purge and Trap—Thermos De-sorption—Gas Chromatograph Coupled with Atomic Fluorescence Detector for the Determination of Ultra—Trace Methylmercury. Science and Technology Development Journal—Natural Sciences, 2, 94-101. https://doi.org/10.32508/stdjns.v2i3.758
Liu, M., Gao, Z., Chen, L., Zhao, W., Lu, Q., Yang, J., et al. (2018) A Reliable Method to Determine Monomethyl-mercury and Monoethylmercury Simultaneously in Aqueous Samples by GC-CVAFS after Distillation. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Tox-icology, 75, 495-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-018-0550-x
Elpa, D.P., Prabhu, G.R.D., Wu, S., Tay, K.S. and Urban, P.L. (2020) Automation of Mass Spectrometric De-tection of Analytes and Related Workflows: A Review. Talanta, 208, Article ID: 120304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2019.120304
Wu, Y.-S., Osman, A.I., Hosny, M., Elgarahy, A.M., Eltaweil, A.S., Rooney, D.W., et al. (2024) The Toxicity of Mer-cury and Its Chemical Compounds: Molecular Mechanisms and Environmental and Human Health Implications: A Comprehensive Review. ACS Omega, 9, 5100-5126. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c07047
Palathoti, S.R., Otitolaiye, V.O., Mahfud, R. and Al Rawahi, M. (2022) Impacts of Mercury Ex-posure on Human Health, Safety and Environment: Literature Review and Bib-liometric Analysis (1995 to 2021). International Journal of Occupational Safety and Health, 12, 336-352. https://doi.org/10.3126/ijosh.v12i4.43125
Contente, M.L. and Paradisi, F. (2018) Self-Sustaining Closed-Loop Multienzyme-Mediated Conversion of Amines into Alcohols in Continuous Reactions. Nature Catalysis, 1, 452-459. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0082-9
Guan, X.L., Chang, D.P.S., Mok, Z.X. and Lee, B. (2023) Assessing Variations in Manual Pipetting: An Un-der-Investigated Requirement of Good Laboratory Practice. Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Advances in the Clinical Lab, 30, 25-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.09.001
Fu, Q., Murray, C.I., Kar-pov, O.A. and Van Eyk, J.E. (2023) Automated Proteomic Sample Preparation: The Key Component for High Throughput and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis. Mass Spectrometry Reviews, 42, 873-886. https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.21750
Christensen, G.A., et al. (2019) De-termining the Reliability of Measuring Mercury Cycling Gene Abundance with Correlations with Mercury and Methylmercury Concentrations. Environmental Science & Technology, 53, 8649-8663.
Kakimoto, S., Yoshimitsu, M. and Kiyota, K. (2022) Development of a Solid Phase Extraction-Based Method for the Quantitative Analysis of Methylmercury in Soil and Sediment. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 109, 332-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-022-03547-x
Antes, A.L., Kuykendall, A. and DuBois, J.M. (2019) The Lab Management Practices of “Research Exemplars” That Foster Research Rigor and Regulatory Compliance: A Qualitative Study of Successful Principal Investigators. PLOS ONE, 14, e0214595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214595
Bell, D., Doussin, J. and Hohaus, T. (2023) Preparation of Simulation Chambers for Experiments. In: Doussin, J.-F., et al., Eds., A Practical Guide to Atmospheric Simulation Cham-bers, Springer International Publishing, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22277-1_3
Shade, C.W. and Hud-son, R.J.M. (2005) Determination of MeHg in Environmental Sample Matrices Using Hg-Thiourea Complex Ion Chromatography with On-Line Cold Vapor Generation and Atomic Fluorescence Spectrometric Detection. Environmental Science & Technology, 39, 4974-4982. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0483645
Ruan, T., Li, P., Wang, H., Li, T. and Jiang, G. (2023) Identification and Prioritization of Environmental Organic Pol-lutants: From an Analytical and Toxicological Perspective. Chemical Reviews, 123, 10584-10640.
Downie, D. and Templeton, J. (2022) Persistent Or-ganic Pollutants: Managing Threats to Human Health and the Environment. In: Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics, Routledge, 471-484. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008873-40
Brusseau, M.L., Anderson, R.H. and Guo, B. (2020) PFAS Concentrations in Soils: Background Levels versus Contaminated Sites. Science of the Total Environment, 740, Article ID: 140017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140017
Li, F., Zhang, J., Jiang, W., Liu, C., Zhang, Z., Zhang, C., et al. (2016) Spatial Health Risk Assessment and Hierarchical Risk Management for Mercury in Soils from a Typical Contam-inated Site, China. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 39, 923-934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-016-9864-7
