全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Multi-Agent Nash Q-Learning for Node Security in Personal Privacy

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113943, PP. 1-19

Subject Areas: Psychology

Keywords: Personal Privacy, Nash Equilibrium, Nash Q-Learning Players, Deep Personal Privacy, General Personal Privacy, Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL), Honeypot, Partial Observability, Belief Vector

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The balance between individuals’ interest in protecting their private information and the interests of other entities (other individuals, confidants, Internet companies, corporations, and government agencies) has been disrupted in the age of ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies). This paper presents a multi-agent learning model based on Nash Q-learning that simulates the interaction between two competing agents—a defender (a private person) and an attacker (a Large ICT company, such as Google or Facebook)—operating in a basic component of privacy nodes with dynamic states (Safe, Attacked, Isolated). Recent work has explored Nash Q-learning in adversarial cybersecurity-for-deception contexts, demonstrating convergence properties in attacker-defender scenarios. The model enables dynamic learning of optimal defense and attack strategies while accounting for the opponent’s behavior. Additionally, the paper addresses the challenges of partial observability and limited inter-agent communication, aligning with recent advances that combine graph-attention with mean-field MARL to improve scalability and decision-making under partial information. We further integrate deep learning components, including attention weighting for critical privacy components—drawing on methods such as AERIAL, which applies attention-based recurrence to handle stochastic observability in multi-agent settings. A simulation involving ten nodes demonstrates the algorithm’s functionality and highlights potential directions for future research.

Cite this paper

Oppenheim, Y. (2025). Multi-Agent Nash Q-Learning for Node Security in Personal Privacy. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e13943. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113943.

References

[1]  Oppenheim, Y. (2024) Personal Privacy in the Age of the Internet. Spines, 140-154.
[2]  Phan, T., Ritz, F., Altmann, P., et al. (2023) Attention Based Recurrence for Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning under Stochastic Partial Observability. arXiv:2301.01649 https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.01649
[3]  Kong, G., Chen, F., Yang, X., Cheng, G., Zhang, S. and He, W. (2023) Optimal Deception Asset Deployment in Cybersecurity: A Nash Q-Learning Approach in Multi-Agent Stochastic Games. Applied Sciences, 14, 357. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14010357
[4]  Lin, Q. and Ma, H. (2023) SACHA: Soft Actor Critic with Heuristic Based Attention for Partially Observable Multi-Agent Path Finding. arXiv:2307.02691.
[5]  Yang, M., Liu, G., Zhou, Z. and Wang, J. (2023) Par-tially Observable Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Based on Graph Attention Network for UAV Swarms. Drones, 7, Article 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7070476
[6]  Kang, S., et al. (2025) MA2E: Addressing Partial Observability in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Masked Auto-Encoder. ICLR. 
[7]  Oppenheim, Y. (2025) A Metric for Calcu-lating the Extent of Non-Knowledge (Level) of Personal Privacy. Open Access Li-brary Journal, 12, e13554 https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113554
[8]  Fin-istrella, S., Mariani, S. and Zambonelli, F. (2025) Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Cybersecurity: Classification and Survey. Intelligent Systems with Applications, 26, 200495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswa.2025.200495
[9]  Busoniu, L., Babuska, R. and De Schutter, B. (2008) Multi-Player Reinforcement Learning: A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 38, 156-172. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSMCC.2007.913919
[10]  Gottlieb, C.C. (1996) Pri-vacy: A Concept Whose Time Has Come and Gone. In: Lyon, D. and Zuriek, E., Eds., Computer, Surveillance, and Privacy, University of Minnesota Press, 156.
[11]  Massey, S.R. (2017) The Ultimate GDPR Practitioner Guide: Demys-tifying Privacy & Data Protection. Fox Red Risk, 1.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133