全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

The Evolution of Metacognition among EFL Learners in the Digital Intelligence Era

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113825, PP. 1-14

Subject Areas: Linguistics

Keywords: Metacognition, EFL Learners, Digital Intelligence Era, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Adaptive Learning, Self-Regulated Learning, Digital Literacy

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI), big data analytics, and ubiquitous connectivity defines the Digital Intelligence Era, fundamentally restructuring English as a Foreign Language (EFL) pedagogy. This paradigm shift necessitates a corresponding evolution in learners’ metacognitive strategies. This paper investigates the dynamic interplay between digital affordances and metacognitive development in EFL contexts. Synthesizing metacognitive theory with contemporary computer-assisted language learning (CALL) research, we argue that while core metacognitive components—knowledge of cognition (declarative, procedural, conditional) and regulation of cognition (planning, monitoring, evaluating)—remain foundational, their operationalization undergoes significant transformation. Key catalysts include AI-driven personalization, immersive technologies, predictive analytics, and unprecedented access to authentic linguistic corpora. Empirical evidence reveals emerging trends toward data-informed self-regulation, enhanced strategic adaptability, and algorithm-mediated autonomy, alongside novel challenges in digital literacies and critical algorithm engagement. We propose an “Adaptive-Metacognitive Engagement” framework and discuss implications for curriculum design, teacher development, and future research trajectories.

Cite this paper

Yang, X. (2025). The Evolution of Metacognition among EFL Learners in the Digital Intelligence Era. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e3825. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113825.

References

[1]  Schwab, K. (2017) The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Busi-ness.
[2]  British Council (2023) The Future of English: Global Perspec-tives.
[3]  Flavell, J.H. (1979) Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906-911. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.34.10.906
[4]  Anderson, N.J. (2002) The Role of Metacognition in Second Language Teaching and Learning. ERIC Digest. ED463659. ERIC Custom Transformations Team.https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED463659.pdf
[5]  Schraw, G. and Moshman, D. (1995) Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 351-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02212307
[6]  Cohen, A.D. (2014) Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. 2nd Edition, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833200
[7]  Zimmerman, B.J. (2002) Be-coming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
[8]  Dörnyei, Z. (2005) The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.05dor
[9]  Holmes, W., Fadel, C. and Bialik, M. (2019) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Rede-sign.
[10]  Siemens, G. and Phil, L. (2011) Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. Educause Review, 46, 30-32.
[11]  Kukulska-Hulme, A., et al. (2015) Mobile Assisted Language Learning: The Duolingo Context. British Council.
[12]  Viberg, O. and Andersson, A. (2020) The Role of Self-Regulation and Structuration in Mobile Learning. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 12, 1-15.
[13]  Bull, S. (2006) Supporting Learning with Open Learner Models. Proceedings of the 4th Hellenic Confer-ence with International Participation: Information and Communication Tech-nologies in Education, Athens, 29 September-3 October, 2004, 1-12.
[14]  Kohnke, L., Zou, D. and Su, F. (2023) Exploring Learner Interaction with AI-Powered Language Learning Tools: Implications for Teaching and Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36, 1-23.
[15]  Warschauer, M. (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. MIT Press.
[16]  Leu, D.J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C. and Tim-brell, N. (2014) The New Literacies of Online Research and Comprehension: Rethinking the Reading Achievement Gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 37-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85
[17]  Chen, J. and Cheng, C. (2022) The Efficacy of Incorporating Virtual Reality into EFL Learning: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review, 36, Article 100452.
[18]  Baron, N.S. (2021) How We Read Now: Strategic Choices for Print, Screen, and Audio. Oxford UP.
[19]  O’Neill, C. (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data In-creases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown.
[20]  Carr, N. (2010) The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton.
[21]  Heift, T. (2016) Intelligent Language Tutoring Systems. In: Farr, F. and Murray, L., Eds., The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, Routledge, 249-265.
[22]  Huang, L.-F. (2021) EFL Learners’ Self-Regulated Strategy Use in an AI-Supported Environment. System, 103, Article 102646.
[23]  Noble, S.U. (2018) Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press.
[24]  Sweller, J., Ayres, P. and Kalyuga, S. (2011) Cognitive Load Theory. Springer.
[25]  Huang, L.-F. and Lin, C.-P. (2024) EFL Learners’ Prompt Engineering Literacy: Developing Critical Evaluation Strategies for Generative AI Outputs. ReCALL, 36, 210-228.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133