全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

Quantitative Research: Types, Advantages, Generalizability & Limitations

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113694, PP. 1-9

Subject Areas: Sociology

Keywords: Quantitative Research, Methodology, Advantages, Correlation, Descriptive, Experimental, Quasi Experimental, Probability Sampling, Limitations

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Quantitative research is a systematic investigation that utilizes numerical data and statistical techniques to determine relationships between variables and draw conclusions about the phenomena under study. It aims to quantify observations, measure variables, and generalize findings to wider populations through statistical, mathematical, or computational techniques. This paper, thus, discusses the various types of quantitative research, sampling techniques under quantitative research and the benefits and limitations of quantitative research. These fundamental concepts of quantitative research are explored following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Hence, from the analysis, the advantages of quantitative research include: generalizability of study findings to broader contexts, faster data collection and analysis, replicability of the studies and reliability and objectivity of the findings. On the other hand, the limitations of quantitative research include: the need for larger study samples, limited contextual understanding and interpretation of findings, rigidity and inflexibility of the research process, and inability to capture the depth of human behavior or social phenomena. Moreover, from this analysis, the types of quantitative research are experimental, correlational, descriptive and quasi-experimental/causal-comparative research, while the sampling technique is mainly probability (simple random sampling, stratified sampling, systematic and cluster sampling methods), with non-probability sampling used when practical limitations exist. Consequently, the goal of this synthesis is to provide scholars and practitioners with a consolidated view of how quantitative research functions within the broader landscape of academic inquiry. Recommendations for improving practice and future research directions are also presented.

Cite this paper

Oranga, J. and Matere, A. (2025). Quantitative Research: Types, Advantages, Generalizability & Limitations. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e13694. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113694.

References

[1]  Oranga, J., Matere, A. and Njurai, E. (2025) The Mixed Methods Research Approach: An Overview. Postmodernism Prob-lems, 15, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.46324/pmp2501084
[2]  Polit, D.F. and Beck, C.T. (2017) Nursing Research: Gener-ating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 10th Edition, Wolters Kluwer.
[3]  Muijs, D. (2011) Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. 2nd Edition, SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849203241
[4]  Gravetter, F.J. and Forzano, L.B. (2018) Research Methods for the Behav-ioral Sciences. 6th Edition, Cengage.
[5]  Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D. and Campbell, D.T. (2002) Experimental and Qua-si-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin.
[6]  Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th Edition, SAGE Publications.
[7]  Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2018) Research Methods in Education. 8th Edition, Routledge.
[8]  Bryman, A. (2016) Social Research Methods. 5th Edition, Oxford University Press.
[9]  Neuman, W.L. (2014) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. 7th Edition, Pearson.
[10]  Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J. and Altman, D.G. (2009) Pre-ferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine, 6, e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
[11]  Babbie, E.R. (2020) The Practice of Social Research. 15th Edition, Cengage Learning.
[12]  Fink, A. (2013) How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide. 5th Edition, SAGE Publica-tions.
[13]  Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. and Airasian, P. (2011) Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. 10th Edition, Pearson.
[14]  Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C. (2015) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental De-signs for Research. Ravenio Books.
[15]  Etikan, I. (2016) Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
[16]  Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2011) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications.
[17]  Fowler, F.J. (2014) Survey Research Methods. 5th Edition, SAGE Publications.
[18]  Tashakkori, A. and Teddlie, C. (2010) Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. SAGE Publications
[19]  Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2017) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd Edition, SAGE Publications.

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133