全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

An Analysis of Public Attitudes toward Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) and the Associated Safeguards in Canada: A Systematic Review

DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1113246, PP. 1-24

Subject Areas: Internal Medicine

Keywords: Autonomy, Public Attitudes, Ethical Principles, Vulnerable Populations, Mental Illness, End-of-Life Care, Healthcare Providers, Beneficence, Non-Maleficence, Religious Beliefs, Cultural Factors, Socioeconomic Status, Legislation, Policy, Equity, Terminal Illness, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Informed Consent, Indigenous Perspectives

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) has become a significant topic of public and ethical discourse in Canada since its legalization in 2015 following the Carter v. Canada Supreme Court decision. This systematic review examines public attitudes toward MAID, focusing on the influence of demographic, cultural, and socio-economic factors, as well as perceptions of the safeguards designed to protect vulnerable populations. The review, adhering to PRISMA guidelines, analyzed 13 studies published between 2015 and 2025, including public opinion polls, policy analyses, and qualitative research. Findings indicate strong public support for MAID, driven by principles of autonomy and dignity, with higher approval among younger, secular, and more educated individuals. However, opposition persists, particularly among older, religious, and conservative groups, who cite concerns about the sanctity of life and potential coercion of vulnerable populations. Safeguards, such as independent assessments and waiting periods, are generally viewed positively, though recent legislative changes, including the expansion of eligibility to individuals with mental illness and the removal of the 10-day reflection period, have raised concerns about their adequacy. The review highlights the need for ongoing public engagement, equitable access to healthcare, and transparent policymaking to address ethical dilemmas and ensure MAID aligns with societal values while protecting vulnerable individuals such as the older population, Individuals considering MAID, Religious or conservative individuals and persons lacking equitable access to healthcare. Recommendations include further research on public concerns, improved safeguards, and greater involvement of healthcare providers in policy development.

Cite this paper

Daramola, I. C. , Aleshinloye, O. , Algitag, F. M. F. , Ifemeje, J. C. C. , Unachukwu, K. , Ashiru, S. and Felix, J. A. (2025). An Analysis of Public Attitudes toward Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) and the Associated Safeguards in Canada: A Systematic Review. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e3246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1113246.

References

[1]  Carter, L., Johnson, H., Shoichet, W., Appellants, G.T., et al. (2015) Attorney General of Canada Respondent. https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/2015/2015scc5/2015scc5.html
[2]  House of Commons of Canada (2016) Stat-utes of Canada 2016 Chapter 3. https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/42-1/bill/C-14/royal-assent
[3]  House of Commons of Canada (2021) Statutes of Canada 2021 Chapter 2. https://www.parl.ca/DocumentViewer/en/43-2/bill/C-7/royal-assent
[4]  Supreme Court of Canada (1993) Rodriguez v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1993] 3 SCR 519.
[5]  Government of Canada (1985) Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46. Department of Justice. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/20141216/P1TT3xt3.html
[6]  Government of Canada (1982) Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, Being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK). https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/index.html
[7]  Government of Canada (2016) Medical Assistance in Dying Law. Department of Justice. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/cj-jp/ad-am/bk-di.html?
[8]  Superior Court of Quebec (2019) Truchon v. Canada. https://vlex.com/vid/truchon-v-procureur-general-819818681#:~:text =Truchon%20v.-,Pro-cu-reur%20G%C3%A9n%C3%A9ral%20Du%20Canada%3A%20 Superior%20Court%20Of%20Quebec%20Finds%20Limiting,To%20End%20Of%20 Life%20Unconstitutional
[9]  Assemblee Nationale Du Quebec (2014) First Session Fortieth Legislature Bill 52 an Act Respecting End-of-Life Care.
[10]  Government of Canada (2020) Legislative Background Bill C-7: Government of Canada’s Legislative Response to the Superior Court of Québec Truchon Decision. https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/pl/ad-am/c7/p4.html
[11]  Close, E., Downie, J. and White, B.P. (2023) Practition-ers’ Experiences with 2021 Amendments to Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying Law: A Qualitative Analysis. Palliative Care and Social Practice, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524231218282
[12]  Angus Reid Institute (2015) For Im-mediate Release Canadian Public Opinion Poll.
[13]  Crumley, E.T., Sheppard, C., Bowden, C. and Nelson, G. (2019) Cana-dian French and English Newspapers’ Portrayals of Physicians’ Role and Medical Assistance in Dying (Maid) from 1972 to 2016: A Qualitative Textual Analysis. BMJ Open, 9, e020369. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020369
[14]  Bozinoff, L. (2015) Media Inquiries: For Immediate Release Sup-port for Assisted Suicide Increases across Four Years.
[15]  Joolaee, S., Ho, A., Serota, K., Hubert, M. and Buchman, D.Z. (2021) Medical Assistance in Dying Legislation: Hospice Palliative Care Providers’ Perspectives. Nursing Ethics, 29, 231-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330211012049
[16]  Schiller, C.J., Pesut, B., Roussel, J. and Greig, M. (2019) But It’s Legal, Isn’t It? Law and Ethics in Nursing Practice Related to Medical Assistance in Dying. Nursing Philosophy, 20, e12277. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12277
[17]  Althagafi, A., Ekong, C., Wheelock, B.W., Moulton, R., Gorman, P., Red-dy, K., et al. (2019) Canadian Neurosurgeons’ Views on Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID): A Cross-Sectional Survey of Canadian Neurosurgical Society (CNSS) Members. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45, 309-313. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105160
[18]  Rousseau, S., Turner, S., Chochinov, H.M., Enns, M.W. and Sareen, J. (2017) A National Survey of Canadian Psychiatrists’ Attitudes toward Medical Assistance in Death. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 62, 787-794. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743717711174
[19]  Brassolotto, J., Manduca-Barone, A. and Zurbrigg, P. (2022) Medical Assistance in Dying: A Review of Related Canadian News Media Texts. Journal of Medical Hu-manities, 44, 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10912-022-09764-z
[20]  Tatalovich, R. (2020) Morality Politics of Phy-sician-Assisted Suicide: Comparing Canada and the United States. International Journal of Canadian Studies, 57, 71-91. https://doi.org/10.3138/ijcs.57.x.71
[21]  Knox, M. and Wagg, A. (2023) Institutional Resistance to Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada: Arguments and Realities Emerging in the Public Domain. Healthcare, 11, Article 2305. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11162305
[22]  Sinding, C., Kumar, K., Smith, P. and Ivanyi, K. (2025) The ‘means Available to Relieve Suffering’: Translating Medical Assistance in Dying Safeguards in Canadian Policy and Practice. Social Policy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746424000629
[23]  Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P.M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., et al. (2021) The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for Reporting Systematic Reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[24]  Huang, X., Lin, J. and Demner-Fushman, D. (2006) Eval-uation of PICO as a Knowledge Representation for Clinical Questions. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Washington, November 11-15, 2006, 359-363.
[25]  Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. and Elmagarmid, A. (2016) Rayyan—A Web and Mobile App for Systematic Reviews. Systematic Reviews, 5, Article No. 210. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
[26]  Thomas, R., Pesut, B., Puurveen, G., Thorne, S., Tishelman, C. and Leimbigler, B. (2023) Medical Assistance in Dying: A Review of Canadian Health Authority Policy Documents. Global Quali-tative Nursing Research, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23333936231167309
[27]  Dhamanaskar, R. and Abelson, J. (2024) Public Deliberation for Ethically Complex Policies: The Case of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada. Healthcare Policy/Politiques de Santé, 20, 83-93. https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2024.27410
[28]  Jeanneret, R., Close, E., Downie, J., Willmott, L. and White, B.P. (2024) ‘My Advocacy Is Not about Me, My Advocacy Is about Canadians’: A Qualitative Study of How Caregivers and Patients Influence Regulation of Medical Assistance in Dying in Canada. Medical Law Review, 32, 301-335. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwae012

Full-Text


Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133