Introduction: This project was a crucial step in exploring the use of ultrasound in odontology, focusing specifically on its effectiveness in scaling and decontaminating dental surfaces. Materials and Methods: The literature search was carried out using a combination of keywords and Boolean equations to optimize the accuracy and relevance of the results obtained. Results: The results obtained provided important insights into the advantages of this innovative approach. Discussion: Analysis of the data clearly showed that ultrasound was significantly effective in removing plaque and bacterial biofilms. Another key aspect of the use of ultrasound in dentistry was its positive impact on the preservation of surrounding tissues. Unlike some more traditional methods, ultrasound enabled more targeted action, minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Conclusion: Despite the promising results obtained in this article, it was clear that further research was needed to deepen our understanding of the effectiveness of ultrasound in dentistry. Larger-scale clinical studies were required to validate the results obtained, focusing on various patient populations and assessing their long-term impact. Advancement, improving clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Continued research is essential to maximize its clinical potential.
Cite this paper
Ziyati, O. , Abou-Obeida, S. and Boussiri, K. E. (2025). Ultrasounds in Odontology: A Literature Review. Open Access Library Journal, 12, e12385. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112385.
Asadoorian, J., Botbyl, D. and Goulding, M. (2014) Dental Hygienists’ Perception of Preparation and Use for Ultrasonic Instrumentation. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 13, 30-41. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12092
Alok, A., Singh, S., Kishore, M. and Shukla, A. (2019) Ultrasonography—A Boon in Den-tistry. SRM Journal of Research in Dental Sciences, 10, 98-104. https://doi.org/10.4103/srmjrds.srmjrds_55_18
Pecheva, E., Sammons, R.L. and Walmsley, A.D. (2016) The Performance Characteristics of a Piezoelec-tric Ultrasonic Dental Scaler. Medical Engineering & Physics, 38, 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.10.008
Gartenmann, S.J., Thurnheer, T., Attin, T. and Schmidlin, P.R. (2016) Influence of Ultrasonic Tip Distance and Orientation on Biofilm Removal. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21, 1029-1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1854-8
Krishna, R. and De Stefano, J.A. (2016) Ultrasonic vs. Hand Instrumentation in Periodontal Therapy: Clinical Outcomes. Periodontology 2000, 71, 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12119
Elbarbary, M., Sgro, A., Khazaei, S., Goldberg, M., Tenenbaum, H.C. and Azarpazhooh, A. (2022) The Applications of Ultrasound, and Ultrasonography in Dentistry: A Scoping Review of the Literature. Clinical Oral Investigations, 26, 2299-2316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04340-6
Paramashivaiah, R. and Prabhuji, M.L.V. (2013) Mechanized Scaling with Ultrasonics: Perils and Proac-tive Measures. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 17, 423-428. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-124x.118310
Gomes Muniz, F.W.M., Haubman Pereira, D. and Pimentel, R. (2020) Comparison between Son-ic/Ultrasonic Instruments for Periodontal Treatment: Systematic Review with Meta Analysis. 187-204.
Yan, Y., Zhan, Y., Wang, X. and Hou, J. (2020) Clinical Evaluation of Ultrasonic Subgingival Debridement versus Ultrasonic Subgingival Scaling Combined with Manual Root Planing in the Treatment of Periodontitis: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Trials, 21, Article No. 113. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-4031-y
Suvan, J., Leira, Y., Moreno Sancho, F.M., Graziani, F., Derks, J. and Tomasi, C. (2020) Subgingival Instrumentation for Treatment of Periodontitis. a Systematic Review. Journal of Clinical Periodontol-ogy, 47, 155-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13245
Manmi, K.M.A., Wu, W.B., Vyas, N., Smith, W.R., Wang, Q.X. and Walmsley, A.D. (2020) Numer-ical Investigation of Cavitation Generated by an Ultrasonic Dental Scaler Tip Vi-brating in a Compressible Liquid. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 63, Article ID: 104963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2020.104963
Laleman, I., Cortellini, S., De Winter, S., Rodriguez Herrero, E., Dekeyser, C., Quirynen, M., et al. (2017) Subgingival Debridement: End Point, Methods and How Often? Peri-odontology 2000, 75, 189-204. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12204
Graetz, C., Plaumann, A., Wittich, R., Springer, C., Kahl, M., Dorfer, C.E., et al. (2016) Removal of Simulated Biofilm: An Evaluation of the Effect on Root Surfaces Roughness after Scaling. Clinical Oral Investigations, 21, 1021-1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1861-9
Shukri, D.K.M., Alturaif, D.J., Alanazi, L.M., Alanazi, A.T., Almalki, R.A., Alrashidy, D.H.S., et al. (2022) The Effect of Dental Ultrasonic Scaler on Dental Restorations. Saudi Journal of Oral and Dental Research, 7, 201-207. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjodr.2022.v07i08.003
Graziani, F., Tinto, M., Orsolini, C., Izzetti, R. and Tomasi, C. (2023) Complications and Treatment Er-rors in Nonsurgical Periodontal Therapy. Periodontology 2000, 92, 21-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12478
Zhang, J., Liu, J., Li, J., Chen, B., Li, H. and Yan, F. (2019) The Clinical Efficacy of Subgingival Debride-ment by Ultrasonic Instrumentation Compared with Subgingival Air Polishing during Periodontal Maintenance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 19, Article ID: 101314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2019.02.001
