|
Phenomenologist at Work Fenomenologui dirbantDOI: 10.3846/11 Keywords: Husserl , phenomenology , method , methodology , affection , Pato ka Abstract: This paper reflects on certain working assumptions of Husserlian phenomenological practice (notably, critique of presuppositions, retrieval from anonymity, and the radical reduction to the living present), using an investigation of interkinaesthetic affectivity as an example. I suggest that in some cases, Husserl’s “stratificational” model (where “higher” levels are founded on “lower” ones, or “later” achievements rest on “earlier” ones) should be replaced with the notion of the ongoing dynamic efficacy of mutually co-founding, interpenetrating, and interfunctioning moments-“through”-which experience proceeds. Finally, I relate the latter model to Pato ka’s call for a genuine (re)integration of the three movements of embodied human life. Article in English Straipsnyje nagrin jamos kelios Husserlio fenomenologin s praktikos prielaidos (ypa i ankstini prielaid kritika, atsiribojimas nuo anonimi kumo ir radikali redukcija gyvenam j dabart ), kaip pavyzdys pasirenkamas interkinestetin s afektacijos tyrimas. Teigiama, kad tam tikrais atvejais Husserlio stratifikacinis modelis (kur auk tesni lygmenys i sid sto ant emesni arba v lesni pasiekimai seka ankstesnius) tur t būti pakeistas nepertraukiamo dinaminio vienas kit pagrind ian i , persipynusi , interfunkcionuojan i moment , kai galinama patirtis, veikimo. Straipsnio pabaigoje is modelis susiejamas su Pato ka kvietimu i esm s (re)integruoti tris mogaus kūni ko gyvenimo veiklas. Straipsnis angl kalba
|